About this travel atlas

The four sources I cross-reference

The atlas grows from four streams. They do not blur on the page. A pin can come from any of them, and the cross-product is what makes a city like Barcelona or Cape Town more useful here than in any one of the sources alone.

Google Maps saved lists

Every Bangkok food list, every Seville café shortlist, every Lisbon viewpoint pile sits as a private saved list inside my Google Maps account. I export them through Google Takeout and import each list into the atlas as a curated collection. The Lists section is the home for these. Most lists mirror a real planning thread, not a general-interest collection.

Atlas Obscura history

When I review an entry on Atlas Obscura, their site records it. The atlas pulls that history in: every pin tagged “Atlas Obscura” here is one I have actually shown up to. The chip is not an aspirational filter. It is the intersection of their catalogue with the places I have been.

UNESCO World Heritage tracking

I track UNESCO sites I have visited as I go. Each pin with a UNESCO ID carries the canonical number in the Facts card, and the link goes to the official UNESCO page. The “visited” flag on those pins is meaningful: it marks a real visit, not a drive-past.

Michelin Guide restaurants I have eaten at

When the budget allows, I make a point of eating at Michelin Guide restaurants in the city. Bib Gourmand entries get visited more than starred ones for the obvious reason. The atlas only carries Michelin entries I have actually eaten at, with the personal review and price tier filled in. The rest of the Michelin universe is intentionally absent until I get there.

A city page like Cape Town surfaces the Google saved list, any Atlas Obscura sites I have logged, the UNESCO sites in or near it, and the Michelin restaurants I have eaten at, all at once. That cross-section is the planning artifact, not the prose around it.

How to read a city page

A good city page should help you decide whether the place belongs in a trip, not decorate it with travel language. The About section gives the orientation: what the city is like today, what history still shapes it, how it changes if you have one or two days instead of one or two weeks.

The Why Visit section is about culture, architecture, landscape, food, music, museums, books, neighborhoods, and nearby routes. The When to Avoid section is blunt by design. Crowds, pickpockets, scams, air pollution, difficult weather, weak transit, and disappointing tourist zones are part of the decision and belong on the page.

Barcelona is not just a Gothic Quarter and Gaudí checklist. It is also beaches, commuter rail, wine country, Montserrat, day trips to Sitges, and the practical reality of pickpockets in the center. The page is meant to help someone plan around both truths without flattening either.

Maps, lists, and pins

Travel planning is spatial. A place that looks essential in a list is sometimes awkward once you see where it sits on the map. The country globe shows the broader atlas. The pin map shows museums, gardens, restaurants, historic sites, stations, viewpoints, UNESCO places, saved ideas, and pins I have actually visited.

The saved-list section on a city or country page surfaces anything I keep in a Google Maps list named after that place. A list can become a city research page, a food shortlist, a day-trip cluster, or a reminder that something was saved years ago and still needs a second look.

Sources and judgment

Public reference data comes from Wikidata, Wikipedia, NASA POWER, OpenStreetMap, UNESCO, the Atlas Obscura catalogue, the Michelin Guide, Google Places, and other open or cited sources. The full list is on the credits page with each license noted.

Photographs, ratings, lists, reviews, and practical judgments are mine. The two sources do not get confused on a page. A population figure is a reference fact. Whether a place is worth building a trip around is a judgment, and it should explain itself.

I expect the site to keep changing. Hours, prices, airline rules, visa policies, and safety conditions move faster than a personal site can guarantee. Treat this as a well-kept notebook and check the live source before booking.

Stack and hosting

I use this project partly to test ideas for my professional career. The architecture choices, the editorial tone, the data pipeline, the way structured fields meet personal prose: these are problems I think about in my day job and the site is where I practice them in public.

If something needs fixing

If a fact is wrong, an attribution missing, a review unfair, or a photo includes you and you would prefer it not, message me on LinkedIn. The reviews are my own and I am happy to clarify how I arrived at one. There are no comments here on purpose; a direct line is the way to reach me.